Considerations To Know About documents of property must present before court case law
Considerations To Know About documents of property must present before court case law
Blog Article
The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.
The main target is to the intention to cause injury. This is often a major challenge: an especially reduced threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.
These platforms empower individuals to understand their legal rights and obligations, promoting a more informed and just society.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Offered the legal analysis on the subject issue, we have been of the view that the claim with the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not really legally sound, Aside from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, they are matter to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case with the petitioners for promotion might be considered, however, we have been distinct inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be deemed for seniority and promotion given that the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, topic to availability of vacancy matter to your approval on the competent authority.
record with the department there is not any record obtainable whatsoever regarding promotion from the petitioner(Promotion)
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or the finding and mould the relief to make it suitable for the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified with the decision in the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
only about the ground of miscases remanded & only on the ground of misreading of evidence only within the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
forty eight . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice on the Peace u/s 22-A is just not obliged to afford a chance of hearing for the accused party; nor obliged to always or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to take into consideration all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal regulation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a lot of the relevant factors. Read more
after release from the jail he lost interest to contest the moment appeal , appeal is dismissed (Criminal Jail Appeal )
two. I have read the learned counsel for your parties and also learned DPG at length, perused the record and observed that:-
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information for being gathered through the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
10. Without touching the merits of your case of click here your issue of once-a-year increases within the pensionary emoluments in the petitioner, in terms of policy decision in the provincial government, this sort of yearly increase, if permissible during the case of employees of KMC, calls for further assessment being made via the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance on account of funding issues and insufficient adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that may be consulted in deciding a current case. It might be used to guide the court, but is not really binding precedent.
To obtain notification from the Supreme Court of Virginia and the Court of Appeals of Virginia when opinions, orders, rule changes, dockets and other information has become readily available, please enter your contact information under.